|
Is
Brit Hume the Dimmest Bulb Among TV's Talking Heads?
WARNING:
This article contains silly subjective assumptions on my part.
With the
retirement of Dan Rather, there was a void to be filled as the least
intelligent TV news anchor. For years Rather filled this role
with aplomb. He had that certain dimness, that indescribable
blank look to the eyes that set him apart. Us fellow morons
looked to him as an inspiration that we too could aspire to the
heights of success that Dan Rather achieved without the benefit of a
three-digit IQ.
We must accept
that the King is gone and now is the time to find the next candidate
that takes the short bus to the anchor desk.
I have found
the perfect candidate: Fox News' Brit Hume.
I chanced
across the delightfully thick-as-a-brick Brit Hume while channel
surfing. And while he'll never replace the King, this is one
truly idiotic anchorman. In order to complete the drawing above,
I recorded and repeatedly watched five minutes of his show, Special
Report with Brit Hume. During this short time, I heard him
make several dunderheaded mistakes that easily put him out ahead (or
behind) the rest of the TV Anchor crowd. He has a way of
sounding exactly like a parody of a shallow Anchor Man.
At one point,
during this five minutes, he referred to the "So called, FISA
court." So called? I guess if you call it the same
thing that every other person in the so called America calls it.
Brit often has problems, with his limited intellect, to disguise his
pro-GOP slant.
Also, during
this time, he started to tick off an itemized list. He refers to
the first item as "A" and then, wouldn't you know it, in the
four seconds elapsed, he forgot his whole format and referred to his
second point as "Second." Ahhh, true
dim-wittedness. Chevy Chase couldn't have done it better.
My favorite
dunce cap moment for Mr. Hume came a while back when he was trying to
make a point on how the casualties in Iraq are overblown by comparing
the number of dead US Service people in Iraq to the number of murder
victims in California during the same time frame:
277 U.S. soldiers have now died in Iraq, which
means that statistically speaking, U.S. soldiers have less of a chance
of dying from all causes in Iraq than citizens have of being murdered
in California, which is roughly the same geographical size.
When a guest
(some smarty pants, I'm sure) pointed out that we had only 150,000
troupes
in Iraq and there were 36 million people in California (this
calculates that soldiers in Iraq are 42 times more likely to die than
the Californian from murder), Brit could only mumble, "Well, I
still think there's some truth to that."
I got to admit
he's right. The truth "to that" being that he is a
shameless shill for the GOP.
|